Mar 06 2009
Posted by David as Bill Simmons, Shots
By David Scott
Boston Sports Media Watch
After less than six months of publication, the Boston Globe on Friday informed its “OT” magazine staff that the weekly publication will cease immediately.
The Globe confirmed the closure with this posted at 8:07 p.m. as Shots was working the story. Four part-time editors and designers were let go according to Johnny Diaz’s story. Part-timer Mark Cofman, who edited the magazine, is among those relieved of duties. The four part-timers cited completely ignores the contributors who were also affected including: Maureen Mullen (Red Sox), Tom Wilcox (Patriots), Scott Souza (Celtics) and Danny Picard (Bruins).
Two Globe sources confirmed the decision to Scott’s Shots on Friday evening before the Globe posted its piece, although it is still not known whether any form of title will continue on-line . The Diaz story only says that Chad Finn and Tony Massarotti will continue their work with Boston.com and the paper.
The story neglects to address what the sell-through on the thin, 13,500-copy run each week was, only claiming to have been available at 400 outlets.
Voice and email messages left for Globe spokesman Bob Powers in the 7:30 p.m. hour - before the Globe posted its excuse article - were not returned as of posting time. An email to Sports Editor Joe Sullivan was also not returned. Both are quoted in the Diaz press release story.
Emails to a few “OT” staffers were not immediately returned either.
It would appear the oversized, newsprint tab fell short of both sports editor Joe Sullivan’s and VP of strategic planning Jay Fogarty’s high hopes from when the publication’s birth was announced in late September of last year.
Fogarty may have sealed the magazine’s fate when he boasted of the new publication: “”It reads more like a Sports Illustrated than a daily newspaper.”
As Shots pointed out at the time:
There shouldn’t be a single new media venture that tries to emulate SI because SI doesn’t even know what it is right now. Fogarty needed to emphasis the additional avenue that OT gives advertisers to get into people’s homes - and stay there for a week. The Globe’s ability to package its print and digital offerings is what will ultimately decide whether “OT” has a sudden death or a long life.
That packaging evidently never was produced.
Ironically, the magazine had just received its best injection of buzz with Chad Finn’s widely discussed piece on WEEI. Insiders, however, say the magazine was too much of a financial drain and indicated newsstand sales were weak at best. Clearly the “Bob Lobel Addition” wasn’t a boon.
• Once again, the Globe and it sports department decision-makers are guilty of not reading tea leaves properly and not giving a new concept a true chance at success. The recently reincarnated “Globe 10.0″ got virtually no support during its NESN run from a marketing standpoint and OT was treated to in-house ads and not much noticeable advertising beyond that. The web-based “Globe 10.0″ will almost assuredly suffer the same fate without a title sponsor and/or 15-second ad spots. (It hasn’t helped any that Bob Ryan has been on what Tony Massarotti termed in Friday’s webisode “sabbatical.” The draw of the show is Ryan and to have him miss substantial parts of the first two weeks of the offering is poor planning. Lack of explanation only compounds the problem.)
• The print run was shockingly small and it says a lot about how big a failure the attempt was. Not being able to cover costs on that likely is a sign that sell-through was abosllutley abysmal and that advertising revenue was close to nil. The venture didn’t even get six months to prove itself.
David Scott writes from a seaside shanty on the shores of Hull, Mass. and can be reached at shotsATbostonsportsmediaDOTcom.
Scott’s first book, with Memphis Coach John Calipari, is scheduled for release in the Fall of 2009 and is now available for pre-order.
9 Responses
Mr Punch
March 7th, 2009 at 9:57 am
1Another problem was the timing of the launch — too cold for a swimsuit issue.
CT Barbarian
March 7th, 2009 at 10:46 am
2I hope someday the full story of “OT” will come out though I doubt it will be more than a foot-note in the history of The Boston Globe. “The OT” was set up nearly overnight in newspaper terms with many details unhandled - I wouldn’t be surprised if “strategic business plan” was one of them. I supect the creation process went along the lines of “The Globe has a big impact in local sports. Let’s leverage that with a weekly”
Jim
March 7th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
3I live in
Harvard
Sq and
I never bought OT simply because I never saw a damn copy in 6 months
Out of Town didn’t even carry it
DrJeff
March 8th, 2009 at 12:20 am
4First The National and now the OT, oh the humanity…………
Mike
March 8th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
5They launched a print product in 2008. That’s really all you need to say about why it failed.
Dana Kiecker
March 12th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
6Mike nails it :
As Brad Delp once sang over a smokey Hibachi..
“Take me home tonight”
Mike J
March 13th, 2009 at 7:07 am
7A big reason “OT” didn’t make it was the writing was more fawning journalism. For instance, the Red Sox coverage was not edgy whatsoever. Controvesy sells. OT was nothing more than a publicity vehicle for Red Sox. I’m guessing the Red Sox were not paying Maureen Mullen to do PR for them. So why was she?
John W.
March 13th, 2009 at 4:23 pm
8David, any word on what’s happening to your buddies over at ESPN890? The Lew and Mike show is being split up for some reason and I didn’t catch why.
David
March 18th, 2009 at 12:03 pm
9John -
Thanks for checking in.
I heard of the split, but I’m not sure what the reason behind it is.
I have no idea how or why the station continues and I continue to believe it as an embarrassment to the ESPN brand. It’s a complete non factor in the market
Let me know if it suddenly goes off the air!
Be well and thanks for reading Shots.
Best,
David
Email Shots
Email David Scott
Sponsored Links
Categories
Recent Comments
Blogroll
Archives
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).